UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
Question – 1 : In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: I. We are going back again to our ancestors and finding out the importance of Yoga Pranayam. II. People in west have already opted it. It does not required any external equipment but only body and soul. Conclusions: I. Ancient science is treasure of many cures and natural remedies of various diseases. II. Technology has overshadowed these ancient sources and introduced new concepts of fitness called gym.
Answer – (A) : Only conclusion I follows
Answer – (B) : Conclusion I and II both follow
Answer – (C) : Neither I nor II follow
Answer – (D) : Only conclusion I follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (D)
Explanation : As it is mentioned in statement I that ‘we are going back again to our ancestors and finding out the importance of Yoga Pranayam’ implies that ancient science is treasure of many cures and natural remedies of various diseases otherwise we won’t had gone back. Also as people in west have opted it shows that ancient science is helpful. But as people are opting for ancient science and yoga more and more now a days, we cannot say that modern technology has overshadowed these ancient sources. Thus only conclusion I follows.
Question – 2 : Directions: For the given question there are two statements are given followed by four conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which one of the lour given conclusions (responses) is definitely drawn from the given statements Statements: I. There are monks among those who are felicitated for remarkable social service. II. Jitananda and Vidyananda are among those felicitated. Conclusions (Responses):
Answer – (A) : Jitananda and Vidyananda did remarkable social service
Answer – (B) : All monks do social service
Answer – (C) : Jitananda and Vidyananda are not monks
Answer – (D) : All monks are felicitated
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (A)
Explanation : From the given two statements it is clear that Jitananda and Vidyananda are among those felicitated who did remarkable social service. Thus only Conclusion I follow. Hence Option A is correct
Question – 3 : Direction: In the given questions, two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements.Statements : (1) Best performance in Olympics fetches a gold medal. (2) Player ‘X’ got gold medal but later was found to be using a prohibited drug. Conclusions : I. ‘X’ should be allowed to keep the gold medal. II. Gold medal should be withdrawn.
Answer – (A) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (B) : Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Answer – (C) : Both conclusion I and II follow
Answer – (D) : Only conclusion I follow
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (A)
Explanation : Statements : (1) Best performance in Olympics fetches a gold medal. (2) Player ‘X’ got gold medal but later was found to be using a prohibited drug. Conclusions : I. ‘X’ should be allowed to keep the gold medal. (not follows, as ‘X’ was found to be using a prohibited drug, hence ‘X’ has no right to keep the gold medal) II. Gold medal should be withdrawn. (follows, as ‘X’ was found to be using a prohibited drug, hence ‘X’ has no right to keep the gold medal hence Gold medal should be withdrawn and given to the next person)
Question – 4 : Direction: In the following question, two statements are followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, definitely follows from the given statements Statements : 1. Parental role in the education of their children is very significant. 2. All parents must realise this. Conclusions : I. Parentless children cannot develop to their maximum potential. II. Parents can help their children in their education.
Answer – (A) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (B) : Both conclusions I and II follow
Answer – (C) : Only conclusion I follows
Answer – (D) : Only conclusion II follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (D)
Explanation : It is no where mentioned that children cannot develop to their maximum potential if they don’t have parents. It is depend on the ability of each children. Hence, conclusion I will not follow. From the given statement “Parental role in the education of their children is very significant” hence parents can help their children in their education. Conclusion (II) is follows.
Question – 5 : Direction: Consider the given statement/s to be true and decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Statement: Irregularity is a cause for failure in exams. Some regular students fail in the examinations. Conclusions: I. All failed students are regular. II. All successful students are not regular.
Answer – (A) : Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
Answer – (B) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (C) : Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow
Answer – (D) : Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (D)
Explanation : According to statement, Both the conclusion are false. Conclusion I does not follow because irregular student fail in exam. Conclusion II is not related to statement.
Question – 6 : Statement is given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statement. Statement: The manager humiliated Sachin in the presence of his colleagues. Conclusions: I. The manager did not like Sachin. II. Sachin was not popular with his colleagues.
Answer – (A) : Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Answer – (B) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (C) : Both conclusion I and II follow
Answer – (D) : Neither conclusion I nor II follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (D)
Explanation : Clearly, none of the given conclusions is either mentioned in or can be drawn from the facts given in the statement. Hence, the answer is (4).
Question – 7 : Direction: A statement is given followed by two assumptions, (1) and (2). You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate your answer. Statement: Theoretical education does not bring in economic advancement and it lends to a steady loss of confidence and money in the country. Assumptions: (1) There is close relationship between development of confidence and economic development. (2) Theoretical education makes priceless contribution for development of confidence.
Answer – (A) : Only 1 is implicit
Answer – (B) : Only 2 is implicit
Answer – (C) : Both 1 and 2 are Implicit
Answer – (D) : Both 1 and 2 are not implicit
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (A)
Explanation : It is given in the statement that when the economic advancement does not occur, it leads to loss of confidence in the country. This signifies that economic advancement and the development of confidence has a close relationship. Thus, assumption I is implicit. Assumption II is too strong to be considered as per the given statement. Therefore, it cannot be true.
Question – 8 : In the following question, some statements followed by some assumptions are given. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the assumptions and then decide which of the given assumptions logically follows the given statements. Statement: The distance of 900 km by road between Bombay and Jafra will be reduced to 280 km by sea. This will lead to a saving of Rs 7.92 crores per annum on fuel. Assumption: I. Transportation by sea is cheaper than that by road. II. Fuel must be saved to the greatest extent.
Answer – (A) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (B) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (C) : Both conclusion I and II follow
Answer – (D) : Neither conclusion I nor II follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (B)
Explanation : According to the statement, sea transport is cheaper than road transport in the case of route from Bombay to Jafra, not in all the cases. So, conclusion I does not follow. The statement stresses on the saving of fuel. So, conclusion II follows. Hence, the correct answer is B.
Question – 9 : Statement is given followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statement to be true even they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statement. Statement : Comic books contain pictures. Conclusions : I. All book contain pictures. II. Books may or may not contain pictures. III. Books other than the comic books does not contain pictures.
Answer – (A) : Only Conclusion II follows.
Answer – (B) : Only Conclusion II follows.
Answer – (C) : Both Conclusion I and II follow.
Answer – (D) : Neither conclusions follows.
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (B)
Explanation : Statement : Comic books contain pictures. Conclusions : I. All book contain pictures. (does not follow) as the described book in statement is comic only.II. Books may or may not contain pictures: If books are comic those will contain pictures, therefore this conclusion follows. III. Books other than the comic books does not contain pictures. It does not follow as some other books may contain pictures. Finally only conclusion (II) follows.
Question – 10 : In the following questions, one statement is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements.Statement To keep myself updated, I always listen to 9 O’clock news on radio. Conclusions: I. The person does not read newspaper. II Recent news is available only on radio.
Answer – (A) : Neither conclusion I nor II is implicit
Answer – (B) : Only conclusion II is implicit
Answer – (C) : Neither conclusion I nor II is implicit
Answer – (D) : Both conclusions I and II are implicit
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (C)
Explanation : Neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows. The person always listen to 9’ O clock news on radio to keep himself updated. This does not imply that he does not read newspaper. Hence, conclusion I does not follow. The use of term “only” in the Conclusion II makes it unsuitable.
Question – 11 : Direction: In the following question, one statement(s) is followed by two Condition// Assumptions. I and II. You have to consider the statement(s) to be true, even if they seem(s) to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions, if any, follow(s) from the given statements (s) Statement-: A car had driven off the road and hit a tree. The driver was efficient enough. The road was not good. The driver drove the car for last fifteen years. Conclusions: I. The accident occurred due to the bad condition of road. II. There was a mechanical fault in the car.
Answer – (A) : Only conclusion I is true
Answer – (B) : Both the conclusions can be true
Answer – (C) : None ‘of the conclusions can be true
Answer – (D) : Only conclusion I is true
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (D)
Explanation : As the driver was experienced and efficient enough and the road was not good. It is clear that There is no mistake of the driver in accident it was occurred due to the bad condition of the road. Hence Conclusion (I) is true. From the statement, it is obvious that the accident occurred due to bad condition of road and there is nothing mentioned about the mechanical fault in the car. Hence Conclusion (II) is not true.
Question – 12 : For the given question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.Statement: (I) Determination is the key to success. If a person determines to achieve a certain goal in his or her life, no one can stop him/her from achieving it. (II) Prioritizing various determined goals is another important aspect of decision making. Conclusions: (I) If I determine to achieve three goals in near future, my energy will get divided into three parts and I can never succeed. (II) Making a prior plan for achieving those three things I can get near to all my goals.
Answer – (A) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (B) : Conclusion I and II both follow
Answer – (C) : Neither I nor II follow
Answer – (D) : Only conclusion I follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (A)
Explanation : As it is given that, prioritizing various determined goals is important aspect of decision making, if one determines to achieve three goals in near future, one has to prioritize and plan his goals in order to achieve success. Thus his energy will not get divided into three parts and he can succeed. Thus conclusion I doesn’t follow but conclusion II follow.
Question – 13 : In the questions below, a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. You have to consider the given statements as true, even if they are at variance from commonly known facts. From the given options, choose the one that provides the correct combination of conclusions that follow/ can be derived from the given statements. Statement: This book ‘Z’ is the only book which focuses its attention on the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980. Conclusions: I. There was no question of poverty before 1950. II. No other books deal with poverty in India from 1950 to 1980.
Answer – (A) : Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Answer – (B) : Only conclusion II follows
Answer – (C) : Both conclusion I and II follow
Answer – (D) : Only conclusion I follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (A)
Explanation : The statement talks about what book Z does. Nothing is mentioned if the poverty existed before 1950. Hence, Statement cannot be concluded. There could be other books which talk about poverty, its cause, and measures taken to eradicate poverty. The statement says that it focuses its attention on the problem of poverty. Poverty is a vast topic dealing with more than problems. Hence 2 also doesn’t follow. The correct option is D.
Question – 14 : Direction: One statement is given followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if It seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow(s) from the given statement. Statement: The present education system needs thorough overhauling. Conclusions: I. Overhauling results in improvement. II. The present education system is outdated.
Answer – (A) : Both I and II follow
Answer – (B) : Only II follows
Answer – (C) : Both I and II follow
Answer – (D) : Neither I nor II follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (C)
Explanation : Clearly, both the conclusions follow. The tone of the statement indicated that the present system is no longer useful and it needs through overhauling for improvement. Hence, the required answer is option 3.
Question – 15 : Direction: In the following questions, two statements are given followed by two conclusions (I) and (II). You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer. Statement: Religions provide the means for attaining eternal peace. People should follow these means. Conclusions : (I) Religions ensure prosperous life. (II) Religions help people to eradicate poverty.
Answer – (A) : Neither Conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
Answer – (B) : Only Conclusion (II) follows
Answer – (C) : Both Conclusions (I) and (II) follow
Answer – (D) : Neither Conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
View AnswerCorrect Answer : (D)
Explanation : As both the conclusions are not clear from the given statements. As religion ensures means to eternal peace and not prosperous life and does not help in eradicating poverty. Hence option D is correct.
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST
UP POLICE CONSTABLE STATEMENT AND CONCLUSION MOCK TEST